Casino game aggregator

One controlled integration layer between operators and game studios.

ALHICA connects gaming platforms, PAMs and wallets to multiple studios and external APIs through a consistent operational model, without forcing upstream systems to implement every provider protocol.

  • One operator-facing integration boundary
  • Normalised session and transaction lifecycle
  • Central operations and reconciliation
01

Abstract provider protocols without hiding evidence

Each connector translates the provider’s authentication, launcher, transaction and error semantics into controlled internal contracts.

Provider-specific identifiers and raw evidence remain correlated so operations can investigate a request without losing the original context.

  • Versioned connector contracts
  • Stable internal transaction model
  • Provider evidence retained for audit
02

Coordinate launch, play and financial effects

The platform manages real and demo launch, authentication, session lifecycle, balance calls, bets, wins, refunds, rollbacks, cancels and game-cycle resolution according to the supported connector contract.

Idempotency and reconciliation are treated as core transaction behaviour, not a manual afterthought.

  • Game and session launch
  • Bet, win and reversal lifecycle
  • Game cycles, bonus flows and configuration
03

Operate through Aggregator Admin

Operational and finance teams can search end-to-end identifiers, review service health, inspect open cycles and work controlled reconciliation queues.

Dashboards and audit evidence reduce dependence on direct database queries or multiple provider consoles.

  • Hub Debug and transaction search
  • Provider and service monitoring
  • Controlled reconcile actions
Frequently asked questions

The essentials, without ambiguity.

Is ALHICA limited to one PAM or platform?

No. The operator-facing boundary is designed to connect approved PAMs, wallets and platforms through explicit adapters.

Does one connector model fit every provider perfectly?

The core model is consistent, while provider-specific behaviour remains isolated and visible inside each connector contract.

Next step

Map the next studio through one operating model.

We can compare its protocol with the current ALHICA contracts and identify the connector, configuration and testing scope.

Request a demonstration